Congress has once again introduced federal legislation,
which if passed, could require out-of-state retailers to charge and collect
sales tax on sales to customers in certain states .
That right, on July 29, 2011, Congressional Democrats in
both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives introduced
“internet sales tax” legislation. In the Senate, S. 1452 was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (Illinois). A companion bill,
H.R. 2701 was introduced in the House by Representative
John Conyers (Michigan). Both bills are referred to by the same title,
the “Main Street Fairness Act”.
By now you’ve certainly heard about the latest Federal
“Main Street Fairness” legislation, as reporters, commentators, industry
groups, on-line retailers, bloggers, and just about everyone else has an
opinion on it. This isn’t surprising as a major focus of the Main Street
Fairness Act is the hotly debated issue of internet sales taxes. But this
isn’t a new debate! The issue of whether sales made over the internet
should be subject to a sales tax collection requirement has been widely
discussed for at least a decade now, and this isn’t the first time similar
legislation has been introduced. Just over a year ago – on July 1, 2010 –
similar legislation was introduced by former House Representative, William
Delahunt (H.R. 5660 – also titled the “Main Street Fairness
Act”).
Proponents of internet sales tax legislation include
brick-and-mortar retailers whose “physical presence” in their state requires
them to charge sales tax, and who argue, therefore, that this puts them at a disadvantage
against certain on-line retailers who are able to sell the same merchandise
to the same customers “tax-free”. (But these sales
aren’t “tax-free” at all, as customers may still owe a use tax.) Also
in support are the state and local governments who lose billions in state
revenue dollars each year to uncollected use taxes. On the other side,
on-line retailers have argued for years, that a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court
decision, Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, does not require them to
charge tax on sales to customers in states in which they lack a physical
presence. On-line retailers and other opponents have also maintained that
imposing a sales tax collection responsibility creates a disproportionate
administrative burden, especially on small on-line retailers who would need to
navigate a complex system of tax rates in order to properly collect sales tax
from customers located in thousands of different jurisdictions.
I covered this latest federal-state development, in not one
but two separate blog posts.
While both posts are similar in that they both provide an overview of
the newest “Main Street Fairness” legislation, the two posts are also
different. So instead of re-producing
one or the other post (or both) as a “State and Local Tax ‘Buzz’ ” post, I
invite you to read my two "Main Street Fairness" blog posts at the SalesTaxSupport.com
and the AllBusiness.com sites, where these two posts were originally published. Here are direct links to these two posts:
- “Main Street Fairness Act. Is SST the Silver Bullet?”, SalesTaxSupport.com, August 10, 2011
- “Can the Main Street Fairness Act Stop the Sales-Tax Madness?”, AllBusiness.com, August 22, 2011
__________________________________________________________________
See the side-bar for
more about Sylvia's contributions to SalesTaxSupport.com and AllBusiness.com.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment!! Relevant comments are sincerely appreciated! However, that comments which are suspected spam, including comments which seek to sell a product or have no purpose other than to drive traffic to an unrelated site will be flagged as spam and deleted.